The original paper is in English. Non-English content has been machine-translated and may contain typographical errors or mistranslations. ex. Some numerals are expressed as "XNUMX".
Copyrights notice
The original paper is in English. Non-English content has been machine-translated and may contain typographical errors or mistranslations. Copyrights notice
Kertas kerja ini membentangkan kaedah mudah untuk membandingkan impedans rangkaian utama buatan (AMN) dengan piawaian Jawatankuasa Khas Antarabangsa mengenai Gangguan Radio (CISPR) 16-1-2. Litar penganalisis rangkaian vektor, yang merupakan instrumen pengukuran impedans, tidak sesuai, dan impedans yang diukur termasuk ketidakpastian pengukuran. Walau bagaimanapun, analisis ketidakpastian lengkap tidak diperlukan dalam kaedah yang dicadangkan. Dengan membandingkan hubungan relatif antara galangan terukur AMN yang sedang diuji dan galangan terukur piawaian pemindahan asal yang galangannya dimodelkan oleh galangan terkawal dalam piawaian CISPR 16-1-2, pematuhan kepada piawaian boleh ditentukan. Magnitud dan fasa impedans AMN boleh dianalisis secara bebas. Untuk menunjukkan kaedah tersebut, kami menggunakan kaedah tersebut pada AMN yang tersedia secara komersial. Keputusan perbandingan didapati bersamaan dengan keputusan berdasarkan analisis ketidakpastian yang lengkap, yang mengesahkan bahawa kaedah perbandingan yang dicadangkan boleh dilaksanakan.
Ryoko KISHIKAWA
National Institute of Industrial Science and Technology (AIST)
The copyright of the original papers published on this site belongs to IEICE. Unauthorized use of the original or translated papers is prohibited. See IEICE Provisions on Copyright for details.
Salinan
Ryoko KISHIKAWA, "Simple Comparison Method for Impedance Measurement of Artificial Mains Network with CISPR 16-1-2 Standard" in IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Communications,
vol. E102-B, no. 2, pp. 345-350, February 2019, doi: 10.1587/transcom.2018EBP3094.
Abstract: This paper presents a simple method for comparing the impedance of an artificial mains network (AMN) with the International Special Committee on Radio Interference (CISPR) 16-1-2 standard. The circuit of a vector network analyzer, which is an impedance measurement instrument, is not ideal, and the measured impedances include measurement uncertainties. However, complete uncertainty analysis is not required in the proposed method. By comparing the relative relationship between the measured impedance of an AMN under test and the measured impedance of the original transfer standards whose impedance is modeled by the regulated impedance in the CISPR 16-1-2 standard, conformity to the standard can be determined. The magnitude and phase of the impedance of an AMN can be independently analyzed. To demonstrate the method, we apply it to a commercially available AMN. The comparison result is found to be equivalent to the result based on a complete uncertainty analysis, which confirms that the proposed comparison method is feasible.
URL: https://global.ieice.org/en_transactions/communications/10.1587/transcom.2018EBP3094/_p
Salinan
@ARTICLE{e102-b_2_345,
author={Ryoko KISHIKAWA, },
journal={IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Communications},
title={Simple Comparison Method for Impedance Measurement of Artificial Mains Network with CISPR 16-1-2 Standard},
year={2019},
volume={E102-B},
number={2},
pages={345-350},
abstract={This paper presents a simple method for comparing the impedance of an artificial mains network (AMN) with the International Special Committee on Radio Interference (CISPR) 16-1-2 standard. The circuit of a vector network analyzer, which is an impedance measurement instrument, is not ideal, and the measured impedances include measurement uncertainties. However, complete uncertainty analysis is not required in the proposed method. By comparing the relative relationship between the measured impedance of an AMN under test and the measured impedance of the original transfer standards whose impedance is modeled by the regulated impedance in the CISPR 16-1-2 standard, conformity to the standard can be determined. The magnitude and phase of the impedance of an AMN can be independently analyzed. To demonstrate the method, we apply it to a commercially available AMN. The comparison result is found to be equivalent to the result based on a complete uncertainty analysis, which confirms that the proposed comparison method is feasible.},
keywords={},
doi={10.1587/transcom.2018EBP3094},
ISSN={1745-1345},
month={February},}
Salinan
TY - JOUR
TI - Simple Comparison Method for Impedance Measurement of Artificial Mains Network with CISPR 16-1-2 Standard
T2 - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Communications
SP - 345
EP - 350
AU - Ryoko KISHIKAWA
PY - 2019
DO - 10.1587/transcom.2018EBP3094
JO - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Communications
SN - 1745-1345
VL - E102-B
IS - 2
JA - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Communications
Y1 - February 2019
AB - This paper presents a simple method for comparing the impedance of an artificial mains network (AMN) with the International Special Committee on Radio Interference (CISPR) 16-1-2 standard. The circuit of a vector network analyzer, which is an impedance measurement instrument, is not ideal, and the measured impedances include measurement uncertainties. However, complete uncertainty analysis is not required in the proposed method. By comparing the relative relationship between the measured impedance of an AMN under test and the measured impedance of the original transfer standards whose impedance is modeled by the regulated impedance in the CISPR 16-1-2 standard, conformity to the standard can be determined. The magnitude and phase of the impedance of an AMN can be independently analyzed. To demonstrate the method, we apply it to a commercially available AMN. The comparison result is found to be equivalent to the result based on a complete uncertainty analysis, which confirms that the proposed comparison method is feasible.
ER -