The original paper is in English. Non-English content has been machine-translated and may contain typographical errors or mistranslations. ex. Some numerals are expressed as "XNUMX".
Copyrights notice
The original paper is in English. Non-English content has been machine-translated and may contain typographical errors or mistranslations. Copyrights notice
pandangan teks lengkap
78
Dengan kejayaan besar rangkaian wayarles 802.11, terdapat banyak cadangan yang menangani jaminan QoS hujung ke hujung dalam WLAN 802.11. Walau bagaimanapun, kami telah mendapati bahawa seni bina QoS hujung ke hujung semasa kekurangan satu atau lebih sifat penting seperti interaksi rentas lapisan, penyepaduan hujung ke hujung, kebolehkonfigurasian semula dan modulariti. Dalam kerja ini, kami mempersembahkan seni bina QoS rujukan hujung ke hujung untuk WLAN 802.11 yang merangkumi komponen QoS berasaskan perisian fesyen (mekanisme, algoritma, perkhidmatan), yang dicadangkan dalam literatur. Untuk menunjukkan kegunaan dan ketepatan seni bina rujukan, kami membentangkan tiga kajian kes seni bina QoS hujung ke hujung yang menangani keperluan QoS yang berbeza seperti lebar jalur dan kelewatan dengan pendekatan yang berbeza seperti perkhidmatan terbeza dan perkhidmatan bersepadu. Kami akan memberikan perbandingan seni bina dan penilaian prestasi seni bina ini. Kami percaya seni bina QoS rujukan boleh membantu pereka bentuk QoS memahami kepentingan dan kerumitan pelbagai komponen QoS semasa fasa reka bentuk dan dengan itu memilih komponen QoS ini dengan sewajarnya.
The copyright of the original papers published on this site belongs to IEICE. Unauthorized use of the original or translated papers is prohibited. See IEICE Provisions on Copyright for details.
Salinan
Hoang NGUYEN, Raoul RIVAS, Klara NAHRSTEDT, "End-to-End Reference QoS Architecture for 802.11 WLAN" in IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Communications,
vol. E93-B, no. 6, pp. 1350-1358, June 2010, doi: 10.1587/transcom.E93.B.1350.
Abstract: With the big success of 802.11 wireless networks, there have been many proposals addressing end-to-end QoS guarantees in 802.11 WLAN. However, we have found that current end-to-end QoS architectures lack of one or more important properties such as cross-layer interaction, end-to-end integration, reconfigurability and modularity. In this work, we present an end-to-end reference QoS architecture for 802.11 WLAN that encapsulates in an unifying fashion software-based QoS components (mechanisms, algorithms, services), proposed in the literature. To show the usefulness and correctness of the reference architecture, we present three case studies of end-to-end QoS architectures addressing different QoS requirements such as bandwidth and delay with different approaches such as differentiated services and integrated services. We will give an architectural comparison and performance evaluation of these architectures. We believe the reference QoS architectures can help QoS designers to understand the importance and the complexity of various QoS components during the design phase and thus choose these QoS components appropriately.
URL: https://global.ieice.org/en_transactions/communications/10.1587/transcom.E93.B.1350/_p
Salinan
@ARTICLE{e93-b_6_1350,
author={Hoang NGUYEN, Raoul RIVAS, Klara NAHRSTEDT, },
journal={IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Communications},
title={End-to-End Reference QoS Architecture for 802.11 WLAN},
year={2010},
volume={E93-B},
number={6},
pages={1350-1358},
abstract={With the big success of 802.11 wireless networks, there have been many proposals addressing end-to-end QoS guarantees in 802.11 WLAN. However, we have found that current end-to-end QoS architectures lack of one or more important properties such as cross-layer interaction, end-to-end integration, reconfigurability and modularity. In this work, we present an end-to-end reference QoS architecture for 802.11 WLAN that encapsulates in an unifying fashion software-based QoS components (mechanisms, algorithms, services), proposed in the literature. To show the usefulness and correctness of the reference architecture, we present three case studies of end-to-end QoS architectures addressing different QoS requirements such as bandwidth and delay with different approaches such as differentiated services and integrated services. We will give an architectural comparison and performance evaluation of these architectures. We believe the reference QoS architectures can help QoS designers to understand the importance and the complexity of various QoS components during the design phase and thus choose these QoS components appropriately.},
keywords={},
doi={10.1587/transcom.E93.B.1350},
ISSN={1745-1345},
month={June},}
Salinan
TY - JOUR
TI - End-to-End Reference QoS Architecture for 802.11 WLAN
T2 - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Communications
SP - 1350
EP - 1358
AU - Hoang NGUYEN
AU - Raoul RIVAS
AU - Klara NAHRSTEDT
PY - 2010
DO - 10.1587/transcom.E93.B.1350
JO - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Communications
SN - 1745-1345
VL - E93-B
IS - 6
JA - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Communications
Y1 - June 2010
AB - With the big success of 802.11 wireless networks, there have been many proposals addressing end-to-end QoS guarantees in 802.11 WLAN. However, we have found that current end-to-end QoS architectures lack of one or more important properties such as cross-layer interaction, end-to-end integration, reconfigurability and modularity. In this work, we present an end-to-end reference QoS architecture for 802.11 WLAN that encapsulates in an unifying fashion software-based QoS components (mechanisms, algorithms, services), proposed in the literature. To show the usefulness and correctness of the reference architecture, we present three case studies of end-to-end QoS architectures addressing different QoS requirements such as bandwidth and delay with different approaches such as differentiated services and integrated services. We will give an architectural comparison and performance evaluation of these architectures. We believe the reference QoS architectures can help QoS designers to understand the importance and the complexity of various QoS components during the design phase and thus choose these QoS components appropriately.
ER -