The original paper is in English. Non-English content has been machine-translated and may contain typographical errors or mistranslations. ex. Some numerals are expressed as "XNUMX".
Copyrights notice
The original paper is in English. Non-English content has been machine-translated and may contain typographical errors or mistranslations. Copyrights notice
Dalam makalah ini kami mencadangkan dua kaedah diagnosis untuk gangguan nadi yang disebabkan oleh crosstalk dalam litar berjujukan menggunakan simulasi kesalahan crosstalk. Kaedah ini membandingkan tindak balas yang diperhatikan dan nilai simulasi pada output utama untuk mengenal pasti satu set kesilapan yang disyaki yang konsisten dengan tindak balas yang diperhatikan. Kaedah pertama ialah kaedah berasaskan mula semula yang menentukan senarai kesalahan yang disyaki dengan menggunakan pengetahuan tentang kegagalan pertama dan terakhir jujukan ujian. Kelebihan kaedah berasaskan mula semula berbanding kaedah menggunakan simulasi penuh ialah pengurangan bilangan kesalahan simulasi dalam proses mendiagnosis kesalahan. Kaedah kedua ialah kaedah berasaskan semula yang menggunakan maklumat keadaan yang disimpan. Kelebihan kaedah berasaskan semula berbanding kaedah berasaskan mula semula ialah pengurangan masa CPU untuk mendiagnosis kerosakan. Keberkesanan kaedah yang dicadangkan dinilai oleh eksperimen yang dijalankan pada litar penanda aras ISCAS '89. Daripada keputusan percubaan kami menunjukkan bahawa bilangan kesilapan yang disyaki yang diperolehi oleh kaedah kami adalah cukup kecil, dan kaedah berasaskan sambung semula adalah jauh lebih cepat daripada kaedah berasaskan mula semula.
The copyright of the original papers published on this site belongs to IEICE. Unauthorized use of the original or translated papers is prohibited. See IEICE Provisions on Copyright for details.
Salinan
Hiroshi TAKAHASHI, Marong PHADOONGSIDHI, Yoshinobu HIGAMI, Kewal K. SALUJA, Yuzo TAKAMATSU, "Diagnosing Crosstalk Faults in Sequential Circuits Using Fault Simulation" in IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information,
vol. E85-D, no. 10, pp. 1515-1525, October 2002, doi: .
Abstract: In this paper we propose two diagnosis methods for crosstalk-induced pulse faults in sequential circuits using crosstalk fault simulation. These methods compare observed responses and simulated values at primary outputs to identify a set of suspected faults that are consistent with the observed responses. The first method is a restart-based method which determines the suspected fault list by using the knowledge about the first and last failures of the test sequence. The advantage of the restart-based method over a method using full simulation is its reduction of the number of simulated faults in a process of diagnosing faults. The second method is a resumption-based method which uses stored state information. The advantage of the resumption-based method over the restart-based method is its reduction of the CPU time for diagnosing the faults. The effectiveness of the proposed methods is evaluated by experiments conducted on ISCAS '89 benchmark circuits. From the experimental results we show that the number of suspected faults obtained by our methods is sufficiently small, and the resumption-based method is substantially faster than the restart-based method.
URL: https://global.ieice.org/en_transactions/information/10.1587/e85-d_10_1515/_p
Salinan
@ARTICLE{e85-d_10_1515,
author={Hiroshi TAKAHASHI, Marong PHADOONGSIDHI, Yoshinobu HIGAMI, Kewal K. SALUJA, Yuzo TAKAMATSU, },
journal={IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information},
title={Diagnosing Crosstalk Faults in Sequential Circuits Using Fault Simulation},
year={2002},
volume={E85-D},
number={10},
pages={1515-1525},
abstract={In this paper we propose two diagnosis methods for crosstalk-induced pulse faults in sequential circuits using crosstalk fault simulation. These methods compare observed responses and simulated values at primary outputs to identify a set of suspected faults that are consistent with the observed responses. The first method is a restart-based method which determines the suspected fault list by using the knowledge about the first and last failures of the test sequence. The advantage of the restart-based method over a method using full simulation is its reduction of the number of simulated faults in a process of diagnosing faults. The second method is a resumption-based method which uses stored state information. The advantage of the resumption-based method over the restart-based method is its reduction of the CPU time for diagnosing the faults. The effectiveness of the proposed methods is evaluated by experiments conducted on ISCAS '89 benchmark circuits. From the experimental results we show that the number of suspected faults obtained by our methods is sufficiently small, and the resumption-based method is substantially faster than the restart-based method.},
keywords={},
doi={},
ISSN={},
month={October},}
Salinan
TY - JOUR
TI - Diagnosing Crosstalk Faults in Sequential Circuits Using Fault Simulation
T2 - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information
SP - 1515
EP - 1525
AU - Hiroshi TAKAHASHI
AU - Marong PHADOONGSIDHI
AU - Yoshinobu HIGAMI
AU - Kewal K. SALUJA
AU - Yuzo TAKAMATSU
PY - 2002
DO -
JO - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information
SN -
VL - E85-D
IS - 10
JA - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information
Y1 - October 2002
AB - In this paper we propose two diagnosis methods for crosstalk-induced pulse faults in sequential circuits using crosstalk fault simulation. These methods compare observed responses and simulated values at primary outputs to identify a set of suspected faults that are consistent with the observed responses. The first method is a restart-based method which determines the suspected fault list by using the knowledge about the first and last failures of the test sequence. The advantage of the restart-based method over a method using full simulation is its reduction of the number of simulated faults in a process of diagnosing faults. The second method is a resumption-based method which uses stored state information. The advantage of the resumption-based method over the restart-based method is its reduction of the CPU time for diagnosing the faults. The effectiveness of the proposed methods is evaluated by experiments conducted on ISCAS '89 benchmark circuits. From the experimental results we show that the number of suspected faults obtained by our methods is sufficiently small, and the resumption-based method is substantially faster than the restart-based method.
ER -