The original paper is in English. Non-English content has been machine-translated and may contain typographical errors or mistranslations. ex. Some numerals are expressed as "XNUMX".
Copyrights notice
The original paper is in English. Non-English content has been machine-translated and may contain typographical errors or mistranslations. Copyrights notice
Melalui analisis model Rayleigh, model penerangan untuk kesan kualiti ulasan rakan sebaya dibina. Aktiviti semakan dinilai oleh kadar penyingkiran kecacatan pada setiap fasa. Kami membuat hipotesis tentang cara pengukuran ini berkaitan dengan kualiti produk. Hipotesis ini disahkan melalui analisis regresi data projek sebenar, dan formula pengiraan konkrit diperoleh sebagai model. Dengan menggunakan mekanisme untuk membina model ini, kita boleh membangunkan kaedah untuk membuat rancangan semakan konkrit dan menetapkan nilai objektif untuk mengurus aktiviti semakan yang berterusan.
The copyright of the original papers published on this site belongs to IEICE. Unauthorized use of the original or translated papers is prohibited. See IEICE Provisions on Copyright for details.
Salinan
Mutsumi KOMURO, Norihisa KOMODA, "A Model to Explain Quality Improvement Effect of Peer Reviews" in IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information,
vol. E93-D, no. 1, pp. 43-49, January 2010, doi: 10.1587/transinf.E93.D.43.
Abstract: Through the analysis of Rayleigh model, an explanatory model for the quality effect of peer reviews is constructed. The review activities are evaluated by the defect removal rate at each phase. We made hypotheses on how these measurements are related to the product quality. These hypotheses are verified through regression analysis of actual project data, and concrete calculation formulae are obtained as a model. Making use of the mechanism to construct this model, we can develop a method for making concrete review plan and setting objective values to manage on-going review activities.
URL: https://global.ieice.org/en_transactions/information/10.1587/transinf.E93.D.43/_p
Salinan
@ARTICLE{e93-d_1_43,
author={Mutsumi KOMURO, Norihisa KOMODA, },
journal={IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information},
title={A Model to Explain Quality Improvement Effect of Peer Reviews},
year={2010},
volume={E93-D},
number={1},
pages={43-49},
abstract={Through the analysis of Rayleigh model, an explanatory model for the quality effect of peer reviews is constructed. The review activities are evaluated by the defect removal rate at each phase. We made hypotheses on how these measurements are related to the product quality. These hypotheses are verified through regression analysis of actual project data, and concrete calculation formulae are obtained as a model. Making use of the mechanism to construct this model, we can develop a method for making concrete review plan and setting objective values to manage on-going review activities.},
keywords={},
doi={10.1587/transinf.E93.D.43},
ISSN={1745-1361},
month={January},}
Salinan
TY - JOUR
TI - A Model to Explain Quality Improvement Effect of Peer Reviews
T2 - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information
SP - 43
EP - 49
AU - Mutsumi KOMURO
AU - Norihisa KOMODA
PY - 2010
DO - 10.1587/transinf.E93.D.43
JO - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information
SN - 1745-1361
VL - E93-D
IS - 1
JA - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information
Y1 - January 2010
AB - Through the analysis of Rayleigh model, an explanatory model for the quality effect of peer reviews is constructed. The review activities are evaluated by the defect removal rate at each phase. We made hypotheses on how these measurements are related to the product quality. These hypotheses are verified through regression analysis of actual project data, and concrete calculation formulae are obtained as a model. Making use of the mechanism to construct this model, we can develop a method for making concrete review plan and setting objective values to manage on-going review activities.
ER -