The original paper is in English. Non-English content has been machine-translated and may contain typographical errors or mistranslations. ex. Some numerals are expressed as "XNUMX".
Copyrights notice
The original paper is in English. Non-English content has been machine-translated and may contain typographical errors or mistranslations. Copyrights notice
Sistem navigasi yang menyediakan panduan laluan dan maklumat trafik adalah salah satu sistem sokongan pemandu yang paling banyak digunakan pada masa kini. Kebanyakan sistem navigasi adalah berdasarkan paradigma peta yang memplot laluan pemanduan dalam versi abstrak peta elektronik dua dimensi. Baru-baru ini, paradigma navigasi baharu diperkenalkan yang berasaskan paradigma realiti tambahan (AR) yang memaparkan laluan pemanduan dengan menindih objek maya pada pemandangan sebenar. Kedua-dua paradigma ini mempunyai ciri-ciri semula jadi mereka sendiri dari sudut kognisi manusia, dan seterusnya saling melengkapi dan bukannya bersaing antara satu sama lain. Tanpa mengira paradigma, peranan mana-mana sistem navigasi adalah untuk menyokong pemandu dalam mencapai matlamat pemanduannya. Objektif kerja ini adalah untuk menyiasat cara peta dan paradigma navigasi AR ini memberi kesan kepada pencapaian matlamat pemanduan: produktiviti dan keselamatan. Kami melakukan eksperimen perbandingan menggunakan simulator memandu dan komputer dengan 38 subjek. Untuk kesan ke atas produktiviti, prestasi pemandu pada tiga tahap (tahap kawalan, tahap taktikal dan tahap strategik) tugas pemanduan diukur untuk setiap peta dan keadaan navigasi AR. Untuk kesan ke atas keselamatan, kesedaran situasi pemandu tentang kejadian berkaitan keselamatan di jalan raya diukur. Untuk mengetahui cara paradigma navigasi ini mengenakan beban kerja kognitif visual pada pemandu, kami menjejaki pergerakan mata pemandu. Sebagai faktor khas prestasi pemanduan, membuat keputusan laluan di titik keputusan yang kompleks seperti persimpangan, jejantas dan laluan bawah telah disiasat tambahan. Beban kerja subjektif peserta dinilai menggunakan Indeks Beban Aktiviti Memandu (DALI). Keputusan menunjukkan bahawa terdapat sedikit perbezaan antara kedua-dua paradigma navigasi pada prestasi pemanduan. Navigasi AR menarik perhatian visual pemandu lebih kerap daripada navigasi peta dan kemudian mengurangkan kesedaran dan tindakan yang betul untuk acara berkaitan keselamatan. Navigasi AR adalah lebih pantas dan lebih baik untuk menyokong pembuatan keputusan laluan di titik keputusan yang kompleks. Menurut penilaian beban kerja subjektif, navigasi AR secara visual dan sementara lebih menuntut.
The copyright of the original papers published on this site belongs to IEICE. Unauthorized use of the original or translated papers is prohibited. See IEICE Provisions on Copyright for details.
Salinan
Kyong-Ho KIM, Kwang-Yun WOHN, "Effects on Productivity and Safety of Map and Augmented Reality Navigation Paradigms" in IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information,
vol. E94-D, no. 5, pp. 1051-1061, May 2011, doi: 10.1587/transinf.E94.D.1051.
Abstract: Navigation systems providing route-guidance and traffic information are one of the most widely used driver-support systems these days. Most navigation systems are based on the map paradigm which plots the driving route in an abstracted version of a two-dimensional electronic map. Recently, a new navigation paradigm was introduced that is based on the augmented reality (AR) paradigm which displays the driving route by superimposing virtual objects on the real scene. These two paradigms have their own innate characteristics from the point of human cognition, and so complement each other rather than compete with each other. Regardless of the paradigm, the role of any navigation system is to support the driver in achieving his driving goals. The objective of this work is to investigate how these map and AR navigation paradigms impact the achievement of the driving goals: productivity and safety. We performed comparative experiments using a driving simulator and computers with 38 subjects. For the effects on productivity, driver's performance on three levels (control level, tactical level, and strategic level) of driving tasks was measured for each map and AR navigation condition. For the effects on safety, driver's situation awareness of safety-related events on the road was measured. To find how these navigation paradigms impose visual cognitive workload on driver, we tracked driver's eye movements. As a special factor of driving performance, route decision making at the complex decision points such as junction, overpass, and underpass was investigated additionally. Participant's subjective workload was assessed using the Driving Activity Load Index (DALI). Results indicated that there was little difference between the two navigation paradigms on driving performance. AR navigation attracted driver's visual attention more frequently than map navigation and then reduces awareness of and proper action for the safety-related events. AR navigation was faster and better to support route decision making at the complex decision points. According to the subjective workload assessment, AR navigation was visually and temporally more demanding.
URL: https://global.ieice.org/en_transactions/information/10.1587/transinf.E94.D.1051/_p
Salinan
@ARTICLE{e94-d_5_1051,
author={Kyong-Ho KIM, Kwang-Yun WOHN, },
journal={IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information},
title={Effects on Productivity and Safety of Map and Augmented Reality Navigation Paradigms},
year={2011},
volume={E94-D},
number={5},
pages={1051-1061},
abstract={Navigation systems providing route-guidance and traffic information are one of the most widely used driver-support systems these days. Most navigation systems are based on the map paradigm which plots the driving route in an abstracted version of a two-dimensional electronic map. Recently, a new navigation paradigm was introduced that is based on the augmented reality (AR) paradigm which displays the driving route by superimposing virtual objects on the real scene. These two paradigms have their own innate characteristics from the point of human cognition, and so complement each other rather than compete with each other. Regardless of the paradigm, the role of any navigation system is to support the driver in achieving his driving goals. The objective of this work is to investigate how these map and AR navigation paradigms impact the achievement of the driving goals: productivity and safety. We performed comparative experiments using a driving simulator and computers with 38 subjects. For the effects on productivity, driver's performance on three levels (control level, tactical level, and strategic level) of driving tasks was measured for each map and AR navigation condition. For the effects on safety, driver's situation awareness of safety-related events on the road was measured. To find how these navigation paradigms impose visual cognitive workload on driver, we tracked driver's eye movements. As a special factor of driving performance, route decision making at the complex decision points such as junction, overpass, and underpass was investigated additionally. Participant's subjective workload was assessed using the Driving Activity Load Index (DALI). Results indicated that there was little difference between the two navigation paradigms on driving performance. AR navigation attracted driver's visual attention more frequently than map navigation and then reduces awareness of and proper action for the safety-related events. AR navigation was faster and better to support route decision making at the complex decision points. According to the subjective workload assessment, AR navigation was visually and temporally more demanding.},
keywords={},
doi={10.1587/transinf.E94.D.1051},
ISSN={1745-1361},
month={May},}
Salinan
TY - JOUR
TI - Effects on Productivity and Safety of Map and Augmented Reality Navigation Paradigms
T2 - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information
SP - 1051
EP - 1061
AU - Kyong-Ho KIM
AU - Kwang-Yun WOHN
PY - 2011
DO - 10.1587/transinf.E94.D.1051
JO - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information
SN - 1745-1361
VL - E94-D
IS - 5
JA - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information
Y1 - May 2011
AB - Navigation systems providing route-guidance and traffic information are one of the most widely used driver-support systems these days. Most navigation systems are based on the map paradigm which plots the driving route in an abstracted version of a two-dimensional electronic map. Recently, a new navigation paradigm was introduced that is based on the augmented reality (AR) paradigm which displays the driving route by superimposing virtual objects on the real scene. These two paradigms have their own innate characteristics from the point of human cognition, and so complement each other rather than compete with each other. Regardless of the paradigm, the role of any navigation system is to support the driver in achieving his driving goals. The objective of this work is to investigate how these map and AR navigation paradigms impact the achievement of the driving goals: productivity and safety. We performed comparative experiments using a driving simulator and computers with 38 subjects. For the effects on productivity, driver's performance on three levels (control level, tactical level, and strategic level) of driving tasks was measured for each map and AR navigation condition. For the effects on safety, driver's situation awareness of safety-related events on the road was measured. To find how these navigation paradigms impose visual cognitive workload on driver, we tracked driver's eye movements. As a special factor of driving performance, route decision making at the complex decision points such as junction, overpass, and underpass was investigated additionally. Participant's subjective workload was assessed using the Driving Activity Load Index (DALI). Results indicated that there was little difference between the two navigation paradigms on driving performance. AR navigation attracted driver's visual attention more frequently than map navigation and then reduces awareness of and proper action for the safety-related events. AR navigation was faster and better to support route decision making at the complex decision points. According to the subjective workload assessment, AR navigation was visually and temporally more demanding.
ER -